Tautology, contradiction and contingency
Hello friends, Welcome to my blog mathstips4u.
In my last post we have seen converse, Inverse and
contrapositive of an implication and its examples. Some of the examples were
left as exercise for you. That will be covered in this post. If you not still read that post, please read that post before watching this video.
In this post we are going to learn what is meant by
tautology, contradiction and contingency and their examples.
Tautology (t):
A statement pattern which is true for all the
combinations of the truth values of its component statements, is called a
tautology. e.g. p v ~p
p
|
~p
|
p v ~p
|
T
|
F
|
T
|
F
|
T
|
T
|
Contradiction(c):
A statement pattern which is false for all the
combinations of the truth values of its component statements, is called a
contradiction. e.g. p É… ~p
p
|
~p
|
p É… ~p
|
T
|
F
|
F
|
F
|
T
|
F
|
It is obvious that the negation of a tautology is a
contradiction and vice versa.
Contingency:
A statement pattern which is neither a tautology nor a
contradiction is called contingency.
e.g. p v q
p
|
q
|
p v q
|
T
|
T
|
T
|
T
|
F
|
T
|
F
|
T
|
T
|
F
|
F
|
F
|
Ex. Determine whether the following statement pattern
is a tautology or a contradiction or contingency.
1) (~p v q) → [p É… (q
v ~q)]
p
|
q
|
~p
|
~q
|
~p v q
= a
|
q v ~q
|
p É… (q v ~q)
=b
|
a → b
|
T
|
T
|
F
|
F
|
T
|
T
|
T
|
T
|
T
|
F
|
F
|
T
|
T
|
T
|
T
|
T
|
F
|
T
|
T
|
F
|
T
|
T
|
F
|
F
|
F
|
F
|
T
|
T
|
T
|
T
|
F
|
F
|
The entries in the last column of the above truth
table are neither all T nor all F.
Therefore, the given statement is neither a tautology
nor a contradiction. It is a contingency.
Now we shall see exercise from my last post on
converse, inverse and contrapositive.
Ex. 1) Write
the converse, Inverse and contrapositive of an implication.
ii)
A family becomes literate if the women in it are literate.
Solution:
Rewriting given statement by
using if. …then.
If the women in the family are
literate, then family become literate.
p: the women in the family are
literate
q: a family become literate
its symbolic form is p → q
a)
Its converse is q → p:
i.e. If a family becomes
literate, then the women in it are literate.
b) Its inverse is ̴p → ̴q
i.e. If the women in a family
are not literate, then family does not become literate.
c) Its contrapositive is ~q →~p
i.e. If a family does not
become literate, then the women in it are not literate.
Ex. 2) Consider
following statements.
a)
If a person is social, then he is happy.
b)
If a person is not social, then he is
not happy.
c)
If a person is unhappy, then he is
not social.
d)
If a person is happy, then he is
social.
Identify the pairs of
statements having same meaning.
Solution:
Let p: a person is social and
q: a person is happy
The above statement patterns
are written in symbolic form.
a) p → q Implication
b) ~p → ~q Inverse
c) ~q → ~p
contrapositive
d) q → p
converse
We know that implication and its
contrapositive are same.
Therefore, (a) and (c)
are same.
And converse and inverse of an implication
are same.
Therefore, (b) and (d)
are same.
Ex. 3. Ex. Rewrite the
following statements without using the conditional form:
2) If it is cold we wear
woolen clothes.
3)I can catch cold if I take
cold water bath.
Solution:
2) p: It is cold q: we wear
woolen clothes
Its symbolic form is p → q.
We know that p → q≡~p
v q.
Therefore ~p v q is the
statement without the conditional form.
i.e. It is not cold or we wear
woolen clothes.
3) rewriting above statement as
If I take cold water bath,
then I can catch cold.
P: I take cold water bath q: I
can catch cold.
Its symbolic form is p → q.
And as
above p → q≡~p v q.
Then the statement without
conditional is
‘I do not take cold water bath
or I can catch cold’.
In this way we have seen tautology, contradiction and
contingency and their examples.
My next post we are going to learn what is meant by quantifiers
and quantified statements.
Thanking you.
Comments
Post a Comment